On Jul 21, 2014 1:18 PM, "Andreas Cadhalpun" <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I think the soversion should have been increased, when the first function
needing 32 byte
> padding was added, together with increasing the
> FF_INPUT_BUFFER_PADDING_SIZE.

We should have, but we forgot and didn't. That's why we are trying to make
up for it now.

[...]

Timothy
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to