On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Jon Stanley wrote:
> > I think that gitweb-caching will help a lot here, I just need to
> > ping warthog9 and get him sponsored, packages built and in
> > epel-testing.
>
> That and continuing to get the caching stuff pushed upstream would be
> good. The discussion I've seen on the git list is generally positive,
> they just want to ensure that it's done in a clean way that doesn't
> negatively impact those who use gitweb without caching. That way we'd
> be able to use the stock gitweb packages and not have to maintain
> another package. :)
>
I was under the impression that gitweb-caching was a massive step away
from gitweb proper. Can anyone correct me on that?
-Mike
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
