I thought, but cannot locate documentation to support the recollection, 
that a FQDN of type userpart.hostpart.tld wouldn't work with fail2ban? 
Or perhaps, just that it makes it that much harder to send the e-mail 
alerts outside?  I would set up the MX record, of course.  Not sure 
about ports getting blocked to send e-mail.

I would want to send the e-mails to my gmail account; the header has:

 From [email protected]  Thu Dec 22 06:54:38 2016
X-Original-To: root



thanks,

Thufir






footnote only. this is in relation to:

http://www.3cx.com/docs/fqdn-management-allocation/

which is for using a FQDN supplied by no-ip (www.noip.com) on Elastix 
2.5 -- which might differ from Elastix v5.  That link might be v5 only.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/intel
_______________________________________________
Fail2ban-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fail2ban-users

Reply via email to