https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1838
--- Comment #7 from [email protected] ---
Created attachment 900
--> https://bugs.exim.org/attachment.cgi?id=900&action=edit
0001-pull-request#45.patch
Ok, I opened a second pull request that try remove calls to things like
gnutls_free.
But for many parts this couldnât be achieved.
I only used store_malloc() instead of more specific projectâs functions
because
it was called elsewhere at many places. If this isnât the right choice, please
tell it.
the original pull request (pull #45) consider that a temporary action could
increase memory requirement much like what that justify the use of size_t.
Though when the behaviour of the code was the same of store_malloc(), I
performed the replacement.
#46 (which include your suggestion) tries to always replace direct or indirect
(like with gnutls_free) calls to malloc() with store_malloc().
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
