On Fr, 2011-05-13 at 12:48 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: > On 12 May 2011 11:44, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can you perhaps comment? You wrote the TODO items below... > [snip] > > I can fix these TODOs. Any objections or concerns? > > None whatsoever, those are embarrassingly leftin from the very early > porting where large chunks of code were copied from the contacts code > that just had an UID...
Did the previous code transmit UID+RECURRENCE-ID? I am wondering why Evolution manages to keep views properly in sync despite the lack of the RECURRENCE-ID - and what'll happen when it starts receiving them. I guess I'll find out... -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [email protected] http://www.estamos.de/ _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
