--- Cory Petkovsek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And finally, I also have the option of cachefs. > What is that good for? cachefs can sit on top of/supplements nfs. In my experience, it's most useful for slow and/or unreliable links (similar situations web caches are good for), though I guess there's no reason it wouldn't work well on fast links (LAN).
Jason __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ EuG-LUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
