On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:25:16 +0100 Mick <[email protected]> said:

> On Monday 10 Apr 2017 18:41:05 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > stuff used to be so much simpler 20 years abck. you just had your login
> > manger run ~/.xsession. this script would run your wm last without & (with
> > exec before if u were smart) and anything u wanted launched on login before
> > that in the script.
> > 
> > today it's a forest of services and god knows what...
> 
> 
> Yes!  Services, service prerequisites upon dependencies, environment parsers, 
> etc, etc.
> 
> Now that you're mentioning using 'exec', I recall reading in this M/L that 
> /usr/bin/enlightenment_start does *not* need exec before it.  Is this correct?

exec is not needed... but it's a little wasteful not using it. exec REPLACES
the shell process with enlightenment_start. without it the parent shell that
runs enlightenment_start stays around with any memory and other state it needs
to just sit around and sleep forever until enlightenment_starts exits. that's a
bit of a waste of resources for a process that will do nothing after
enlightenment_start exits... :)

-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [email protected]


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to