On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 20:18:57 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 18:33:05 +1000 David Seikel <[email protected]> > said: > > > On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 17:19:17 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 18:07:43 +1000 David Seikel <[email protected]> > > > said: > > > > > > > On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 10:45:32 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The > > > > Rasterman) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 07 Jul 2014 17:56:36 +0100 Richard Ullger > > > > > <[email protected]> said: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm running e18 from the Arch repos and am getting the > > > > > > following error: > > > > > > > > > > > > Jul 07 17:28:37 richards-aspire slim[366]: > > > > > > ERR<eo>lib/eo/eo.c:597 in lib/edje/edje.eo.c:328: you called > > > > > > func 'edje_obj_signal_emit' (345) which is unknown in class > > > > > > 'Evas_Smart'. > > > > > > > > > > > > The error is constantly being generated several times a > > > > > > second and is filling the systemd journal. > > > > > > > > > > > > The installed packages are: > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightenment 0.18.8-1 > > > > > > elementary 1.10.0-1 > > > > > > efl 1.10.0-2 > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this a known issue that may have been fixed in e19? > > > > > > > > > > e19 (git) does this much less - it's a harmless complaint > > > > > about someone using an interface that an object doesnn't > > > > > support (eo is designed to detect this and safely complain > > > > > and march on with doing nothing). > > > > > > > > I'm getting a similar message, only for Elm_Layout. Harmless > > > > other than filling up logs and getting in the way of real error > > > > messages. Drop it to warning or debug level? Get rid of it > > > > completely? Or some other way to make this bogus error message > > > > go away? > > > > > > it's not bogus. it's real. but just not harmful. its telling you > > > that your api call is basically a nop where you might expect it to > > > actually do something (otherwise why call it?) > > > > I'm not calling that API at all, something inside Elm is. In fact > > for the OP, it's the result of running Enlightenment, not them > > calling some API. > > not saying you are doing it. > > > If it's not harmful, then it shouldn't be an error. That's the > > bogus part, it should be a warning. > > problem is warning are off by default so you just never see. For both the OP and me, that's exactly what we want, to not see them, so no problem. B-) -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
