On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:05:40 -0300 Wido <[email protected]> said: > sorry!!!! I've tryed to recompile E on another desktop I have but it failed > while compiling ecore (will try some more before writing with that to the > list). > And no, currently there are some E packages in debian testing, but is not as > rich as the one in E repository.
then... we can't help you. we can't magically make a year-old binary you have stop leaking. if you can't upgrade, there is little point doing anything as any fix we have would come int he form of an upgrade and new release. you problem isn't a leak. your problem is an inability to upgrade. > BTW, who maintains that repository? I would be glad to lend my unused CPU > cicles to compile the DEB packages (with help on how to, because I never > really did that), so everybody can have fresh packages with every new > snapshot or version compiling packages isn't a problem. frankly i rebuild all of efl+e+elementary +enjoy+a pile of other things in under 10 mins (5-10mins). i do it generally 2 or 3 times per day. the problem is someone has to go manually change debian packaging metadata files for every library, binary etc. etc. that they build and that involves editing 1 or more files per package... and that assumes you have working debian build metadata files already. if you don't, you'll have to create them. i thought lutin and quaker were actively handling debian and/or ubuntu packages. in fact... what is going on? at least the last packaged stuff for ubuntu seems to be rev 49898. i see some traffic early november for accepting beta 1 into debian experimental. elementary seems to have been rejected. we've done beta2 and are pushing onto a beta3 by now. this is pretty slow. i'm wondering if it's not just time to have an apt repository of our own we can just automate builds for... we have old old old packaging stuff lutin and quaker did up to snap 063... quaker - lutin - any comments? to me, at least, it seems we'd be better off with our own apt repo? > 2010/12/8 Cedric BAIL <[email protected]> > > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Wido <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all. I've tryed this several times and I'm crashing the laptop (as in > > > reproducing the error) always. Raster, I did unloaded the ecomorph module > > > even before going dual-head, so I don't think there is a problem with > > > ecomorph > > > > > > The E version I have is 16.999.063. I know its kind of old, but is the > > > compiled version available for debian testing in the E repos > > > Xorg version is 7.5 > > > Processor is Intel core 2 duo T7300 with 2G of RAM > > > GPU is Intel GM965/GL960 integrated graphics > > > > Oh, god ! You are using that revision ! It's one year old and as far > > as I remember did have many issue... You should really upgrade. I > > think you can get some up to date package from debian testing or > > something like that. > > -- > > Cedric BAIL > > > > > > -- > Wido > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > WikiLeaks The End of the Free Internet > http://p.sf.net/sfu/therealnews-com > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users > -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: WikiLeaks The End of the Free Internet http://p.sf.net/sfu/therealnews-com _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
