On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:29:32 -0500 Texstar <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/27/2010 10:12 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:14:41 +1000 David Seikel<[email protected]> > > said: > > > >> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:43:18 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:35:23 +1000 David Seikel<[email protected]> > >>> said: > >>> > >>>> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:01:16 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The > >>>> Rasterman) <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> such bugs should get fixed. aqpps return 0 when they exited > >>>>> cleanly with no error. anything else is an error. enlightenment, > >>>>> unlike everyone else, doesn;t ignore it. it bothers you. this > >>>>> solves the "why the hell did that window just vanish?" question. > >>>>> mind you - e could do a much better ui than pop up a dialog. e > >>>>> should really have a proper notification queue/log/stack thing > >>>>> at some point. will worry about that for e18. > >>>> > >>>> Now you tell me. :-P > >>> > >>> the dialog is ok for now. better than not knowing what happened to > >>> the app. apps that dont exit with a 0 exit code are saying "i had > >>> an error". i'd bet there are quite a few that dont do this right. > >>> this is a good opportunity to file bug reports with those apps so > >>> they clean up their act. they are just like functions that do > >>> this: > >>> > >>> int dothing(int blah) { > >>> // do thing here > >>> return; > >>> } > >>> > >>> it's a bug. we shouldnt be hiding bugs. we should be bringing them > >>> out and passing them to the right place to be fixed - in this case > >>> the apps in question. :) > >>> > >>> just saying that we could have a less intrusive way of > >>> logging/notifying the user than a dialog they have to dismiss in > >>> the middle of their screen. :) > >> > >> I meant "now you tell me after I wrote that dialog years ago > >> according to your desires at the time". lol > > > > thats what i said - dialog is fine. we have no alternative > > mechanism right now. we'd need a nice log + notification thing. we > > probably want one in the end anyway. but what you did was just fine. > > > > Since there is no configuration option to suppress the output how > difficult would it be for me to simply patch it out of E for now? Any > tips on where to look in the code base? e_exec.c, search for a call to _e_exec_error_dialog around line 382 and comment it out. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in U.S. and Canada $10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in marketing Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
