On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 13:31:40 -0800 Dustin Nicholas Jenkins <[email protected]>
said:

> Hi Cedric,
> 
> Neither of those options made any change at all.  I did a clean build of 
> all of my sources and logged out and back in again (rather than a simple 
> restart), but still no change.
> 
> I'm happy to do more testing as it comes up.

hmmmm...only thing i can think of is some endianness issue we havent caught -
it should be endianness-safe. there's enough testing of being 64bit safe - tho
endianess  is becoming less and less something that can be tested. i have
nothing big-endian. ppc was the last major world of big-endian and it's dying.
not sure what to say other than... "patches appreciated" :) chances are its
inside edje somewhere - or eet. i'd be adding printfs' into edj for all the
parameters and load 1 of these parts in a specialised test program (just opens
a window  that is resizable with one of these offending edje objects in it) and
see if the params decoded @ runtime match those in the src file (or that are
defaults). then u'd have somethng to go on if u found something here...

> Cheers,
> Dustin
> 
> 
> On 03/01/2010 06:52 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Carsten Haitzler<[email protected]>
> > wrote: 
> >> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 03:32:10 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> >> <[email protected]>  said:
> >>
> >>      
> >>> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 2:43 AM, Dustin Nicholas Jenkins
> >>> <[email protected]>  wrote:
> >>>        
> >>>> Hi Tom,
> >>>>
> >>>> Sure thing:
> >>>> http://picasaweb.google.ca/dustinjat88mph/Enlightenment#5442793210005706418
> >>>>
> >>>> This is a corner of my desktop.  You can see my two icons on the desktop
> >>>> in the top left that are bigger than the others, which is weird.  Also,
> >>>> the settings window is bizarre.
> >>>>          
> >>> ouch! this looks like a bug in edje layout calculations...
> >>>
> >>> i don't have any big endian machine to test, but given that we often
> >>> test on x86, arm and mips, i guess this is the only arch difference
> >>> from your system to what we're used to :-/
> >>>        
> >> maybe.. cedric... this is your case finally of an edje calc cache bug? on
> >> ppc? maybe somehow we have an endianess issue we havent spotted?
> >>      
> > Maybe, I don't have any big endian machine to test also.
> >
> > Dustin could try recompiling edje with --disable-edje-calc-cache. If
> > it doesn't change anything, could you try with --enable-fixed-point
> > and report any change ?
> >
> > Raster, Gustavo, do you know the part in the edje theme that isused to
> > handle this case ?
> >    
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
> 


-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [email protected]


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to