On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:45:45 -0500 "Joe(theWordy)Philbrook" <[email protected]>
said:

> 
> There is a difference between what e16 meant by a virtual desk top and
> what the term means in e17...
> 
> What e17 calls a virtual desktop is more like what e16 called multiple
> desktops. Which could each have their own background image...
> 
> IN e16 each one of the multiple desktops had as many virtual desktops
> as set in the virtual desktop settings. And each of the virtual
> desktops would share the same background image.
> 
> The "VIRTUAL" desktops in e16 shared something else however.
> Occasionally (probably due to my insistence on large fonts that I can
> actually read) a gui tool won't fit properly on the screen. There may
> be some buttons that I need just a little bit too far down, or even
> too far to the right for me to get at them... But with e16 as long as
> I opened the said gui tool in something besides the bottom row or
> rightmost column of my virtual desktops I could switch to the virtual
> desktop below, (or to the right) And the rest of the gui tool would be
> accessible there...
> 
> Is there a way to do this with e17's idea of a virtual desktop???

no. as such e17 shows and hides windows when flipping desktops - thus windows
on another desktop are literally hidden and not visible. this tends to be more
efficient.

-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [email protected]


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to