absolutely and I believe in redoing the navigation would involve redoing the
site. If anyone would like to share any other mock ups other than mekius go
ahead..... I personally like simple site designs like this:
http://fc06.deviantart.com/fs30/i/2008/126/3/0/Inkscape_Site_devel____front_by_duckgoesoink.png(flame
me if you want)
minus the fact that I think the "inkscape in brief" section should be just a
wider news section and take the little news box off the side. but I like
designs like that because they list all the links to the different web
software. Songbird does this on their site too.... but their site is a
little too busy http://getsongbird.com/
just my thoughts....

On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 9:06 PM, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> On 3-Aug-08, at 10:07 PM, Nick Hughart wrote:
>
> > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >> On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:33:34 -0500 Nick Hughart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> babbled:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Ian Caldwell wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Yup, I'd like to eliminate submenus completely One navigation on
> >>>> all pages
> >>>> that has links to pretty much everything.  The goal of the new
> >>>> site is make
> >>>> it a lot more usable. With regularly updated news, and a lot of
> >>>> static
> >>>> content around it.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> This is bad design imo, it leads to overload.  Having to dig
> >>> through a
> >>> ton of links to find the one you want is crazy, it's best to be
> >>> able to
> >>> filter towards your goal IMO.  Much easier to filter then to try and
> >>> find a link among many that sounds like what you want.  This is
> >>> how my
> >>> brain works anyway.
> >>>
> >>
> >> we don't need some new navigation system... we need to simplify
> >> content, only
> >> put up what we absolutely need on the e.org "brochure" site (it's
> >> meant to be a
> >> simple "couple of pages" brochure/flier like set of pages with just
> >> the minimum
> >> needed to find out what e is, who is involved, how/where to get it).
> >>
> >> the other bits (trac/bugzilla, wiki, docs etc. etc.) are what is
> >> intended for
> >> large-scale documentation and info - and those (the wiki
> >> especially) is READILY
> >> accessible to people to edit.
> >>
> >
> > Yes, I realize this, most of the links in the submenus will just point
> > to the wiki/tracker/etc.  But people found it hard to even find these
> > things on the current site.  So it would be nice to point them to
> > where
> > they need to look instead of them having to decode links that don't
> > necessarily match anything they are looking for.  So the changes to
> > navigation are nothing stellar, just reorganizing the menu and making
> > the submenu a little more visible so people immediately see things to
> > click on.  At least this is what I did with my mockup, haven't seen
> > anyone else come forward with anything yet.
> >>
>
> I'm with Mekius. The number one complaint that I get about the website
> is that the navigation sucks. If we can do something to make it easier
> for people to find stuff then it's a win.
>
> dan
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to