Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 09:11:50 -0700 > From: Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [e-users] enlightenment-users Digest, Vol 22, Issue 3 > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Friday, 09 May 2008, at 13:01:11 (+0100), > sda wrote: > > > Also please note that currently this repo is INDEED only for > > OpenSuSE users and all I wrote is valid. This is my home project and > > IMHO - the only OpenSuSE project (if not consider my other projects) > > which allow rebuild of a .spec files to get a current cvs of > > Enlightenment. > > Actually, last I heard the spec files in CVS worked fine on SuSE. If > this is no longer the case, we can certainly look at what changes > would need to be made to them. > > > 'Mezzanine' in this particular case is useless. It's not OBS > > (OpenSuSE Build Service) related, it's NOT in ANY available OpenSuSE > > repo and as I only can guess - never will be. > > Your loss. And there was no need to be rude. > > But Mezzanine works just fine on SuSE and can be built from the SRPM > found at http://beta.kainx.org/wiki/view/Mezzanine. It's quite useful > for anyone building or managing RPMs and SRPMs regardless of distro. > > Michael > > -- > Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > "Shouldn't we help her find her way back to a place called home?" > "Honey, she's wearing synthetic plaid. It's a four day drive and a
Dear Michael, please check your e-mail to see the details on particular sense of E-cvs spec files for OpenSuSE. Your credentioals are mentioned as "Packager:" in spec files. It's funny, because I've got no idea which distro could use them out of the box. All of them should be modified to reflect at least naming differences of different distros packeges. And disclosure needed that they're NO WAY capable to work with E-cvs without some naming modifications. Or better to say that they're simply not intended for E-cvs at all. sda ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
