Hello again, E users:

I had an interesting E session yesterday. I was stress testing a
script I wrote to create edj files and put them on workspace
backgrounds.  I was changing backgrounds frequently, and I noticed the
system was getting sluggish, but didn't realize the problem until I
tried to use an E menu to start a terminal and a popup from E said it
could not fork a process.  Hm.  In an existing xterm I ran top and
found that E was using 85% of my system's 1 gig of memory and 2 gig of
swap was full.

I restarted several times and re-tested and E's memory consumption
would begin around 1.5% of the system, which is fine. After flushing
through several background changes, it appeared to me that E's memory
consumption grows about 3% each time the backgrounds are changed (on a
system with 8 desktops).

I'm attaching the script I was using and the edc file it requires to
make edj files.  I wonder if you run this over and over,

epjbackground.pl -c Y -w 2 -d /usr/local/share/Backgrounds
epjbackground.pl -c Y -w 3 -d /usr/local/share/Backgrounds
epjbackground.pl -c Y -w 4 -d /usr/local/share/Backgrounds
[and so forth for all workspaces]


do you see the same thing?

This happens in a Fedora 8 system running

enlightenment-startup-1.0-2.fc8.prof_k
enlightenment-backgrounds-1.0-2.fc8.prof_k
enlightenment-0.16.999.042-6.20080225cvs.fc8.prof_k

How to diagnose? Does enlightenment_remote have a way to report on memory usage?

I tested this running E as a stand-alone desktop environment as well
as a window manager within a Gnome desktop. Same outcome.


PJ

-- 
Paul E. Johnson
Professor, Political Science
1541 Lilac Lane, Room 504
University of Kansas
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to