On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 18:13:35 +0200
Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

| Yasufumi Haga wrote:
| > On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:53:03 +0900
| > Masaru Nomiya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > 
| > | Haga-san> I'm compiling e16-0.16.8.10 now, and I tried using
| > | Haga-san> "--enable-visibility-hiding" option with the configure
| > | Haga-san> script. The script finished normally, and then when I run 
"make",
| > | Haga-san> it showed an error:
| > | 
| > | Umm, I could compile without any problem.
| > | 
| > | I ran "./configure --enable-sound --enable-fsstd --enable-visibilty-hiding
| > | --prefix=/usr/X11R6", then make & make install.
| > 
| > Thanks for your reply, Nomiya-san.
| > I think I found something about this error. When I built e16 I was using 
gcc 3.3.6,
| > and `-fvisibility=hidden' option doesn't seem to be supported by this 
version of gcc
| > or the option may be broken or something...  In any case, it'd probably be 
necessary
| > to upgrade my gcc.
| > 
| Yeah, a 4'ish gcc is required. However, --enable-visibility-hiding is 
| useless without --enable-modules, which is an (experimental) feature to 
| build support for certain features (currently sound, imlib2/Xft/Pango 
| fonts) as loadable modules, mostly to try and see if this could shave 
| some bytes off the memory usage when the feature isn't used.

It was correct that I guessed I needed to upgrade my gcc :) But in ther first 
place
I thought "--enable-visibility-hiding" option had its own role without any other
options. Thanks for giving me the simple overview about the role of this option.
Regards.
--Yasufumi

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to