David Seikel wrote:
Should devs continue to use sf.net cvs, or do we want to move development to the new server once all the teething problems are sorted out and it's rock solid? sf.net dev cvs is a lot less problematic than anon, coz if it sucks too much devs won't use it, and if devs don't use it, then sourceforge won't have any source to forge.
I think spreading the load between a new server and sf.net would be a good thing. Permit only devs to get to sf.net, if folks think that would be sufficient. Everyone else goes to the new server.
Unless sf.net would be slower then the new server for devs. The devs should have priority access.
-- Until later, Geoffrey ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
