Chad Kittel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Sat, 12 Nov 2005 16:51:24 -0600]:
> David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Sun, 13 Nov 2005 04:13:33 +1000]:
> > On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 19:02:57 +0100 Michael Karlsson
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi!
> > > Does this mean that imlib2 and imlib2-loaders aren't needed
> > > anymore?
> > 
> > imlib2 is still needed for other things.  imlib2-loaders is just an
> > addon module for imlib2.
> 
> Edje still checks for "imlib2-config" and "imlib2 - version >= 1.0.0"
> in the configure stage[1], yet does not reference imlib anywhere else
> in the compile process. Can this just be considered a
> defect/oversight in the configure script?
> 
> [1]
> ...
> checking for
> imlib2-config... /opt/lunar/enlightenment/bin/imlib2-config checking
> for imlib2 - version >= 1.0.0... yes ...
> 

Didn't catch this until now, the exact same thing is true of e_utils'
configure step.  It checks for imlib2 but never actually uses it in the
compile it seems.

-- 
  _
(\o/) Chad 'v3rt1g0' Kittel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 /_\  Milwaukee, WI (USA)
"...staring up at heaven from the bottom of a glass" - Savatage


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to