Am Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:32:54 +0800 schrieb Alan Trick:

> Quite possibly, although to be fair, most if this isn't X's fault -
> Nvidia and ATI have been pretty bad about supplying decent drivers for
> linux, so most sytems are running without and hardware accelleration.
> Here's a good look at it.
> 
> http://dri.freedesktop.org/~jonsmirl/graphics.html
> 
> X does have support for dropshadows and transparency and such through
> it's Composite extention, however without hardware acceleration
> dropshadows are a bit slugish and transparency is completely unusable.

Very great in informative site. It helps me much to understand some
problems. Some time ago I used DirectFB and XDirectFB. I was impressed
by its speed, shadow and real transparent windows. If I compare the
window display times of XDirectFB to plain X is feels extrem fast. But
the problem is that there's no hardware OpenGL for Nvidia and I need
it. :-(

If I change my virtual/multible desktops on "normal" X with E16 I never
understand why windows need so many time to display. For example if I
change to the window where Firefox is I'm able to see first a the
window frame filled with the desktop background for a very small moment
and then the window content is displayed. It's hard to see that my
Nvidia FX 5200 has so much 3D-Power, but is so slow for my desktop. And
if I use one of this huge Gtk+ pixmap themes it's going to be very slow
if I change desktops.

On his site he wrote that XDirectFB, OS X and others use rootless X.
For me it sounds this is better. Why doesn't x.org also use a rootless
X server?

regards
Andreas


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to