On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 14:47:41 +0800
Didier Casse wrote:

> I don't know if it's good or bad. I don't
> really care at this point of time since it's not an official release
> anyway. It's a "courtesy" release of the thing in cvs.


The point is that NOT_RELEASE has no meaning to rpm.

In mandrake, at least, were this and actual pre10 release we would do so
as such 

%define ver      0.17.0
%define rel      0.pre10.1

If it is a cvs snapshot rather than an actual pre

%define ver      0.17.0
%define rel      0.<date of snapshot>.1

Pkgs you build and offer to others Should adhere to the policies
used by the distribution you use.
Doing otherwise may place any whom use your rpms at risk.



    Charles

-- 
Your best consolation is the hope that the things you failed to get weren't
really worth having.
-------------------------
Mandrake Linux 10.2 on PurpleDragon
2.6.8.1-20mdk-i686-up-64GB
http://www.eslrahc.com
-------------------------
 

Attachment: pgpfQR26X4stA.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to