On Saturday, 09 October 2004, at 09:50:49 (-0400), David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> Shame on you. *You* tried to start a debate by replying to a sig. > Traditionally, sigs are off-limits. Suck it up and don't reply to > them. daveA Kindly point me to the e-mail in which I replied to a sig. Astute observers will note that Massimo's reply attribution said "Charlie." Furthermore, his reply was directed to "Charlie Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>", and the list was merely CC'd. Anyone with an adequate e-mail client will also note that Massimo's two messages are adjacent in the thread, all of which tells us that Charlie (appropriately and wisely) replied to Massimo's sig off-list, and Massimo erroneously copied the list on *his* reply to Charlie. Now that that's settled, we return you to your regularly scheduled e-users. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "i'm just an effigy to be disgraced to be defaced your need for me has been replaced and if i can't have everything well then just give me a taste it comes down to this your kiss your fist and your strain it gets under my skin within take in the extent of my sin" -- Nine Inch Nails, "sin" ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
