On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:27:07 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:

> OK, thanks for the hint. If I understand this correctly, then the multiple  
> desktop mechanism of both KDE and sawfish must somehow work without  
> virtual roots, else this problem would also occur with them, which it  
> doesn't. Is that correct?

most wm's dont use virtual roots - so yes. you are correct. this is the case.
they are not illegal or not allowed - they are just not common -b ut they allow
you to do things that are a lot harder without a virtual root - and to do much
more seamlessly - example. scrolling windows is possible to do 100% syncronously
with a virtual root. otherwise its not possible. being able to hide and show all
windows at once and control a single desktop as a single entity is possible with
a virtual root - otherwise it is not.

it's just a matter of writing their code correctly to walk window trees
correctly. it may not be operas fault - it may also be qt... this i dont know...
but its definitely a matter of not walking window trees right.

-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
熊耳 - 車君 (数田)                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本)


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to