On Fri, Mar 2, 2018, at 17:04, Davide Andreoli wrote: > I asked this in irc three times now but I'm not getting usefull feedbacks :( > > Why are we putting legacy widgets under the efl namespace?? > fe: Efl.Ui.Image_Legacy > > This is not the correct name for that widget ! it should be Elm.Image > (q66 agree with me on this) > > Is there some tecnical reason ? or is just the continuation of the approach: > "give objects random name" ? :P
It should be Elm_Image *and* it should not be contained in an .eo file. The goal should be to move *all* legacy outside of .eo files back to pure C. D5 > > Thanks > davemds > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
