Allon Mureinik has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: [WIP] engine: User queries improvements
......................................................................


Patch Set 9: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve

(5 inline comments)

some minor inline issues, and a major issue with the name.
Other than that - OK.

....................................................
File backend/manager/dbscripts/create_functions.sql
Line 42: 
Line 43: CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION fnSplitterUuid(ids TEXT)  RETURNS SETOF 
UUID AS
Line 44: $function$
Line 45: BEGIN
Line 46:  IF ids != '' THEN
Is this if still necessary?
Line 47:        RETURN QUERY
Line 48:                SELECT CAST(regexp_split_to_table(ids, ',') AS UUID);
Line 49:  END IF;
Line 50: END; $function$


....................................................
File backend/manager/dbscripts/create_views.sql
Line 779: AS
Line 780: 
Line 781: SELECT     permissions.id as id, permissions.role_id as role_id, 
permissions.ad_element_id as ad_element_id, permissions.object_id as object_id, 
permissions.object_type_id as object_type_id,
Line 782:              roles.name as role_name, roles.role_type as role_type, 
roles.allows_viewing_children as allows_viewing_children
Line 783: FROM         permissions INNER JOIN
please move the INNER JOIN to a new line an indent proprely.
Line 784: roles ON permissions.role_id = roles.id;
Line 785: 
Line 786: 
Line 787: --


....................................................
File backend/manager/dbscripts/multi_level_administration_sp.sql
Line 264: 
Line 265: END; $procedure$
Line 266: LANGUAGE plpgsql;
Line 267: 
Line 268: Create or replace FUNCTION GetAllRolesByUserIdAndGroupIds     
(v_user_id UUID, v_group_ids text)
why add this redundant tab?
Line 269: RETURNS SETOF roles
Line 270:    AS $procedure$
Line 271: BEGIN
Line 272:    RETURN QUERY SELECT roles.*


....................................................
Commit Message
Line 7: [WIP] engine: User queries improvements
Line 8: 
Line 9: The following patch contains two improvements:
Line 10: 1. Removed unneeded calls to some functions at permissions_view, by 
creating the small_permissions_view -
Line 11: permissions_view should be used for UI purposes , for engine/internal 
permission check, small_permissions_view should be used.
Please find a better name than "small_permissions_view".
How about "internal_permissions_view"?
Line 12: 2. Introduction of new splitter function.
Line 13: 
Line 14: With multiple paragraphs if necessary.
Line 15: 


Line 10: 1. Removed unneeded calls to some functions at permissions_view, by 
creating the small_permissions_view -
Line 11: permissions_view should be used for UI purposes , for engine/internal 
permission check, small_permissions_view should be used.
Line 12: 2. Introduction of new splitter function.
Line 13: 
Line 14: With multiple paragraphs if necessary.
please remove
Line 15: 
Line 16: Bug-Url: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/880969
Line 17: Change-Id: I62fa797fbf286513183f0a3c4409ce79bec35342
Line 18: Signed-off-by: Michael Kublin <mkub...@redhat.com>


--
To view, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/9825
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I62fa797fbf286513183f0a3c4409ce79bec35342
Gerrit-PatchSet: 9
Gerrit-Project: ovirt-engine
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Michael Kublin <mkub...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Allon Mureinik <amure...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Barak Azulay <bazu...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Eli Mesika <emes...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Juan Hernandez <juan.hernan...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michael Kublin <mkub...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Moti Asayag <masa...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Oved Ourfali <oourf...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Yair Zaslavsky <yzasl...@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
Engine-patches mailing list
Engine-patches@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-patches

Reply via email to