Federico Simoncelli has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: core: Add the QEMU guest agent support
......................................................................


Patch Set 1: (3 inline comments)

....................................................
File backend/manager/dbscripts/create_tables.sql
Line 495:    migrating_to_vds UUID,
Line 496:    app_list VARCHAR(4000),
Line 497:    display INTEGER,
Line 498:    acpi_enable BOOLEAN,
Line 499:    qga_enable BOOLEAN,
I think I need to add a script for an ALTER TABLE (current installations). Is 
that correct?
Line 500:    session INTEGER,
Line 501:    display_ip VARCHAR(255),
Line 502:    display_type INTEGER,
Line 503:    kvm_enable BOOLEAN,


....................................................
File 
backend/manager/modules/common/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/core/common/businessentities/VmDynamic.java
Line 450:     public VmDynamic() {
Line 451:         mExitStatus = VmExitStatus.Normal;
Line 452:         mWin2kHackEnable = false;
Line 453:         acpi_enable = true;
Line 454:         qga_enable = Config.<Boolean> 
GetValue(ConfigValues.QEMUGuestAgentEnabled);
I'm not particularly happy with this. I suppose it's the frontend business to 
load the the default value and pass it back.
Line 455:         kvm_enable = true;
Line 456:         session = SessionState.Unknown;
Line 457:         boot_sequence = BootSequence.C;
Line 458:     }


....................................................
File 
backend/manager/modules/vdsbroker/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/core/vdsbroker/vdsbroker/VmInfoBuilderBase.java
Line 61:         createInfo.add(VdsProperties.kvmEnable, 
vm.getkvm_enable().toString()
Line 62:                 .toLowerCase());
Line 63:         createInfo.add(VdsProperties.acpiEnable, 
vm.getacpi_enable().toString()
Line 64:                 .toLowerCase());
Line 65:         createInfo.add(VdsProperties.qgaEnable, 
vm.getqga_enable().toString()
I was wondering if it's better to check vm.getqga_enable() and add it only when 
it's enabled (true). That way we can probably circumvent any possible error 
with the vdsm hosts that doesn't have the qgaEnable keyword yet.
Line 66:                 .toLowerCase());
Line 67: 
Line 68:         createInfo.add(VdsProperties.Custom,
Line 69:                 
VmPropertiesUtils.getInstance().getVMProperties(vm.getvds_group_compatibility_version(),


--
To view, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/7179
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I78f6f2d372fd94ae235b1803bcde6ec0f188d488
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Project: ovirt-engine
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Federico Simoncelli <fsimo...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Allon Mureinik <amure...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Ayal Baron <aba...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Federico Simoncelli <fsimo...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Maor Lipchuk <mlipc...@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
Engine-patches mailing list
Engine-patches@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-patches

Reply via email to