Alon Bar-Lev has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: fklsnr: Introduce standalone fence_kdump listener
......................................................................


Patch Set 9:

Hi,

I am sorry, but I am limited in time these days.

I would like to ask why the alternative of queue was selected instead of 
periodic update.

All we need is a snapshot of sessions once in interval into database, if there 
were 10000000 packets came from host in 5 seconds, we should update it once.

So we just need to keep timestamp within each session of last flushed, and each 
interval flush into datbase these that receive > flush.

This should solve all, including reloading previous run sessions into memory 
when starting up, even if adding them as now() into the sessions.

If I understand the current implementation during brief review, I think the 
above is lower load and simpler.

Thanks,
Alon

-- 
To view, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/27201
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ieec3bad47bbba860a52a9ff4e2eb7f61277f4e36
Gerrit-PatchSet: 9
Gerrit-Project: ovirt-engine
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Martin Peřina <mper...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alon Bar-Lev <alo...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Barak Azulay <bazu...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Eli Mesika <emes...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin Peřina <mper...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Oved Ourfali <oourf...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Saggi Mizrahi <smizr...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: automat...@ovirt.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: oVirt Jenkins CI Server
Gerrit-HasComments: No
_______________________________________________
Engine-patches mailing list
Engine-patches@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-patches

Reply via email to