mooli tayer has posted comments on this change. Change subject: tools: Remove cumbersome NotificationMethod abstraction. ......................................................................
Patch Set 12: (1 comment) .................................................... File backend/manager/modules/common/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/core/common/EventNotificationMethod.java Line 6: public enum EventNotificationMethod { Line 7: EMAIL(0); Line 8: Line 9: private int methodId; Line 10: private static Map<Integer, EventNotificationMethod> mappings; 1.) My problem with it is the DRY principle. with switches we keep the value of each enum value twice: once in the value field and again in the forMethodId function - such solutions can cause problems in the future. More then that it's non standard (though i'm sure that's debatable...) 2.) Holding the method name in the db is acceptable by me. It's a tradeoff between storage space on one hand to the db being more readable and the mapping being simpler on the other hand. I would gladly do it here since I see it as an improvement. what say you Yair & Moti? Line 11: Line 12: static { Line 13: mappings = new HashMap<Integer, EventNotificationMethod>(); Line 14: for (EventNotificationMethod value : values()) { -- To view, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/22135 To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/settings Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I8b71c4e78bbdca3d02d2ac4ef419b9d3d7d58761 Gerrit-PatchSet: 12 Gerrit-Project: ovirt-engine Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: mooli tayer <mta...@redhat.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Barak Azulay <bazu...@redhat.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Eli Mesika <elimes...@gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Juan Hernandez <juan.hernan...@redhat.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin Peřina <mper...@redhat.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Moti Asayag <masa...@redhat.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Yair Zaslavsky <yzasl...@redhat.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Yaniv Bronhaim <ybron...@redhat.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: mooli tayer <mta...@redhat.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: oVirt Jenkins CI Server Gerrit-HasComments: Yes _______________________________________________ Engine-patches mailing list Engine-patches@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-patches