Roy Golan has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: engine: Watchdog model validation
......................................................................


Patch Set 2:

(2 comments)

....................................................
File 
backend/manager/modules/bll/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/core/bll/validator/VmWatchdogValidator.java
Line 34:      * otherwise it's OK.
Line 35:      */
Line 36:     public ValidationResult isModelCompatibleWithOs() {
Line 37: 
Line 38:         List<String> watchDogModels = 
getOsRepository().getWatchDogModels(osId, version);
I'm thinking of the flexibility of the osRepo API here. is it better to have 
more suitable types in the API - in that case return List<WachdogTypes> instead 
of List<String>

  class OsRepository {
   ...

   List<WatchdogType> getWatchDogModels(int osId, Version version);
  
  }

while this is coupling the repository to the code enums, its making the client 
code better. 


thoughts?
Line 39:         List<VmWatchdogType> vmWatchdogTypes = new 
ArrayList<VmWatchdogType>();
Line 40: 
Line 41:         for (String watchDogModel : watchDogModels) {
Line 42:             
vmWatchdogTypes.add(VmWatchdogType.getByName(watchDogModel));


Line 38:         List<String> watchDogModels = 
getOsRepository().getWatchDogModels(osId, version);
Line 39:         List<VmWatchdogType> vmWatchdogTypes = new 
ArrayList<VmWatchdogType>();
Line 40: 
Line 41:         for (String watchDogModel : watchDogModels) {
Line 42:             
vmWatchdogTypes.add(VmWatchdogType.getByName(watchDogModel));
its simpler to loose the directly check it here 

 if (vmWatchdog.getModel().equals(VmWatchdogType.getByName(watchDogModel)) {
     return Valid
 }
 return FAILED...

and the vmWatchdogTypes is redundant
Line 43:         }
Line 44: 
Line 45:         return (!vmWatchdogTypes.contains(vmWatchdog.getModel()))
Line 46:                 ? new 
ValidationResult(VdcBllMessages.ACTION_TYPE_FAILED_ILLEGAL_WATCHDOG_MODEL_IS_NOT_SUPPORTED_BY_OS)


-- 
To view, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/18448
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I7a470fd389f0fcd5d077c56a2f69ee2f79fce065
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Project: ovirt-engine
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Gustavo Frederico Temple Pedrosa <gustavo.pedr...@eldorado.org.br>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Doron Fediuck <dfedi...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Itamar Heim <ih...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Laszlo Hornyak <lhorn...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Leonardo Bianconi <leonardo.bianc...@eldorado.org.br>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Lior Vernia <lver...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin Betak <mbe...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michal Skrivanek <michal.skriva...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Omer Frenkel <ofren...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Roy Golan <rgo...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tomas Jelinek <tjeli...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Vitor de Lima <vitor.l...@eldorado.org.br>
Gerrit-Reviewer: oVirt Jenkins CI Server
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
_______________________________________________
Engine-patches mailing list
Engine-patches@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-patches

Reply via email to