And indeed it was Alan who I was referring to in my message. I generally agree with Alan’s thinking below.
Eliot > On 6 Mar 2019, at 13:45, Alan DeKok <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 6, 2019, at 7:23 AM, Aura Tuomas <[email protected]> wrote: >> The realm used by the peer is initially “eap-noob.net”. The server can >> assign another realm in Initial Exchange. The main purpose for assigning >> another realm is that the peer can later use it for roaming in access >> networks that have AAA routing set up for the assigned realm. > > This is fine for an initial draft. I'd avoid implementing anything that > uses "eap-noob.net", though. > > The correct domain to use is .arpa: > > https://www.iana.org/domains/arpa > > The controlling document here is RFC 3172. > > It looks like EAP-TEAP-BRSKI requires a similar NAI for provisioning. So it > would best best to coordinate both the name, and the use of it. Perhaps > "provisioning.arpa" could be used as a generic name, and then subdomains > within that could be used for particular purposes. > > Alan DeKok. > > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
