> Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2025 10:55:02 +0900 > Cc: Psionic K <[email protected]>, > Psionic K via Emacs news and miscellaneous discussions outside the scope of > other Emacs mailing lists <[email protected]>, > dick <[email protected]>, > James Thomas <[email protected]>, Jean Louis <[email protected]>, > [email protected] > From: Psionic K via Emacs news and miscellaneous discussions outside the > scope of other > Emacs mailing lists <[email protected]> > > > "Bro" was also the person who sent a 3K LOC commit for gnus and became > > offensive when asked to restructure it into smaller patches that can be > > reviewed. > > This is what we call relitigation or, since you don't actually have a > new point to litigate, rubbing salt in the wound. > > From what I have observed, most of you are very, very deeply diverged > into an insider's club, and this kind of group-reaffirming behavior is > why. > > > people don't understand how exactly Free Software works > > The framing is most certainly in question in this discussion. In > twenty five years of web 2.0 technologies coming to the forefront, the > FSF beat the same drum, telling consumers to stop liking it and > businesses to stop making money. If ever the long play tactics were > supposed to work, it should have happened inside of two decades. > > If you can't do anything any faster or more effective, get out of the way.
This thread quickly becomes a discussion about FSF and its policies, which are utterly unrelated to Emacs, even tangentially. If people want to discuss the FSF policies, let alone bash them, they should take this elsewhere. Such discussions are way too far from being on-topic even here. So please stop discussing these issues here. Please also avoid cross-posting with gnu-misc-discuss; instead, move the entire discussion there. TIA --- via emacs-tangents mailing list (https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-tangents)
