Christian Moe <[email protected]> writes: > I attach two patches. One contains my revisions on top of your patch > with edits from earlier in this thread. The other (marked > 0001-org-*-REBASED.patch) is all the revisions squashed down to a fresh > patch that should apply cleanly on main.
Thanks! LGTM. Applied, onto main. https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=15f35712b I have a few more comments and suggestions, but we can apply them separately. > Some outstanding questions: > > - Do we need an example for =bibentry=? It would contain the full > bibliographic data, so the table would overflow (and I'd need to > come up with a fictive journal for the fictive article) It does not have to be a table, especially if you just need a single example. > - It could probably say more about the latex-oriented processors, but > that gets very latex-y in a complicated, processor-dependent way. I am reading this again, and I feel that it might be easier for the readers if we move 15.2 Citation export processors before 15.1 Citations. WDYT? We can also add more things about latex-oriented processors in a separate sub-section, as it is done for 15.3 Bibliography printing. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
