* Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> [2026-03-25 09:29]: > Also, I think I need to be clear here - we do not currently suffer from > high inflow of LLM-generated patches, unlike some other projects. > From my perspective, beyond aligning with GNU policy, we should simply > make sure that our contributor community keeps being healthy. That > involves addressing both concerns about LLMs from some community > members, as well as not alienating LLM users (who are only growing in > numbers, including some prominent community members, like John Wiegley).
Future people will be saying like this: --------------------------------------- The old mailing list was unwelcoming and exhausting. Simple questions met with cryptic cynicism, conversations wandered off-topic, and getting help felt like a draining battle rather than collaboration. Today, instead of navigating harsh conversations with strangers who might or might not help, I simply ask a local LLM and get a clear answer instantly. The struggle of dealing with unknown people is gone, replaced by a tool that is patient, direct, and always available. -- Jean Louis
