branch: externals/eglot
commit 5b9a164ada9f10110e7148a816ac12b174a17db7
Author: João Távora <joaotav...@gmail.com>
Commit: GitHub <nore...@github.com>
Per #180: frame lsp-mode.el comparison as historical even more evidently
* README.md (Historical differences to lsp-mode.el): New section title.
Also fix link.
---
README.md | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index cefccad..078f1a1 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ eglot-shutdown`.
-# Differences to lsp-mode.el
+# Historical differences to lsp-mode.el
Around May 2018, I wrote a comparison of Eglot to `lsp-mode.el`, and
was discussed with its then-maintainer. That mode has since been
@@ -243,10 +243,10 @@ refactored/rewritten and now
[purports to support](https://github.com/joaotavora/eglot/issues/180)
a lot of features that differentiated Eglot from it. It may now be
very different or very similar to Eglot, or even sing with the birds
-in the trees, so [go check it out](emacs-lsp). That said, here's the
+in the trees, so [go check it out][emacs-lsp]. That said, here's the
original comparison, which I will not be updating any more.
-Eglot is considerably less code and hassle than lsp-mode.el. In most
+"Eglot is considerably less code and hassle than lsp-mode.el. In most
cases, there's nothing to configure. It's a minimalist approach
focused on user experience and performance.
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ Under the hood:
- Doesn't *require* anything other than Emacs, but will automatically
upgrade to work with stuff outside Emacs, like `company`,
`markdown-mode`, if you happen to have these installed.
-- Has automated tests that check against actual LSP servers.
+- Has automated tests that check against actual LSP servers."
[lsp]: https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/
[rls]: https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/rls
