Eli Zaretskii writes: > However, it seems robin.el needs a separate definition of conversion > rules. What I had in mind was to use conversion rules of an existing > input method. Can that be done?
You can reuse existing quail-define-rules. All you have to do is replace the part (quail-define-rules with (robin-define-package "package-name" "comment" Other than that, the format is compatible. -- TAKAHASHI Naoto [email protected] _______________________________________________ emacs-bidi mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-bidi
