> On Aug 9, 2016, at 20:19, [email protected] wrote:
> Why the name of that strategy is `:one_for_all`, not `:all_for_one`?
They just picked the first clause of the slogan?
Unus pro omnibus, omnes pro uno
("One for all, all for one")
-- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unus_pro_omnibus,_omnes_pro_uno
-r
--
http://www.cfcl.com/rdm Rich Morin [email protected]
http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/resume San Bruno, CA, USA +1 650-873-7841
Software system design, development, and documentation
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elixir-lang-talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-talk/C28F1764-6E69-437E-89D2-4526C1473D0A%40cfcl.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
