Nelson H. F. Beebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Wed, Jan 11, 2006: > This morning, I redid build attempts for elinks in a 64-bit SPARC > Solaris 10 environment for these versions: > > elinks-0.10.6 > elinks-0.11rc0 > elinks-0.11.0 > elinks-current-0.11-20060109 > elinks-current-0.12-20060109 > > I used make options "V=1 -i -k" to display compiler lines, and force > compilation attempts on the full source. I also used simplified > options with cc, just enough to choose a 64-bit build environment, but > nothing else that would influence what parts of system header files > got included. > > If an elinks developer wants to examine the logs, I can make them > available privately off-list.
Sure I will have a look, although my past history of viewing your build logs is not so productive. > One thing that may be a show stopper at link-time is the need for > 64-bit versions of several support libraries. This morning, I built > and installed a 64-bit version of -lbz2, but more such work may be > needed. > > If the compilation errors in the code can be fixed, then we can see > whether a 64-bit link and successful execution is possible. I remember problems with finding 64-bit version of X11 being a problem. We use an autoconf macro for this, so if autoconf is not of any help (yet) it will probably be a lot of work. -- Jonas Fonseca _______________________________________________ elinks-users mailing list [email protected] http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-users
