Hi Martin, On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 09:21:01AM +0100, Martin Liška wrote: > Thank you for the dump support of the `.gcc_except_table`, I think > elfutils is the only tool that can dump the information. That being > said, I would like to improve the quality of the output.
Thanks. > Before the change: > ``` > Call site table: [ 0] Call site start: 0x10 > Call site length: 12 > Landing pad: 0x2a > Action: 3 > [ 1] Call site start: 0x1c > Call site length: 123 > Landing pad: 0 > Action: 0 > > Action table: [ 0] ar_filter: 1 > ar_disp: 0 > [ 1] ar_filter: 2 > ar_disp: -3 -> [ 0] > ``` > > After: > ``` > Call site table: > [ 0] Call site start: 0x10 > Call site length: 12 > Landing pad: 0x2a > Action: 3 > [ 1] Call site start: 0x1c > Call site length: 123 > Landing pad: 0 > Action: 0 > > Action table: > [ 0] ar_filter: 1 > ar_disp: 0 > [ 1] ar_filter: 2 > ar_disp: -3 -> [ 0] > ``` > > ChangeLog: > > * src/readelf.c (print_debug_exception_table): Add newlines. This certainly makes the output more consistent/clear. Pushed, Mark
