On Thu, Oct 30, 2025, at 7:00 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> I am not sure what is going on there. Is the current patch not working
> correctly? The intention is to only try to include/support
> asm/perf_regs.h on linux for i686 and x86_64 arches.
Perhaps we have been assuming incorrectly, and some of these debian targets
define *both* __sparc__ and __x86_64__? Then they don't provide the perf_regs.h?
It may be necessary to go with our alternate plan of adding configury item, to
remove all ambiguity. I'll author a patch.
--
All the best,
Serhei
