https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30980
--- Comment #6 from Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org> --- Thanks, that seems to be the correct thing to do here. Note that there are a couple more asserts on this code path. In particular in __libdwfl_find_elf_build_id there is what apparently is the root of the confusion here: // MOD->E_TYPE is zero here. assert (ehdr->e_type != ET_REL || mod != NULL); Which passes because mod != NULL. But probably should have been a red flag. This is my fault, I refactored this code and kept these asserts without fully understanding why there were (not) needed. We should go over all asserts in the library code and rewrite/remove them. It is never a good thing to trigger an abort in library code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
