* Mark Wielaard: > This seems a wrong warning since we aren't accessing the field member > of the struct, but are taking the address of it. But we can do the > same by adding the field offsetof to the base address. Which doesn't > trigger a runtime error.
I think the warning is correct. I believe it is motivated by the GCC optimizers using this to infer alignment of the original pointer. It won't make a difference for this expression, but it can cause crashes elsewhere with strict-alignment targets. Thanks, Florian
