https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27925
--- Comment #9 from Jim Wilson <wilson at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The patch looks OK to me. In the old code, for float and double (not complex) we call pass_in_fpr_lp64d because it returns the same result as pass_in_fpr_lp64f and not worth an extra check for that. In the new code, float and double are now handled separately, and the call to pass_in_fpr_lp64d for the float case looks a little funny but it will give the right result. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
