https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25068
Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed| |2019-10-16 CC| |mark at klomp dot org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org> --- Thanks for the example crashes. These seem caused by 2 asserts, a missing bounds check and an off-by-one bounds check. Which should be resolved by the following patch: diff --git a/libcpu/i386_data.h b/libcpu/i386_data.h index b8a34c3e..06356b8a 100644 --- a/libcpu/i386_data.h +++ b/libcpu/i386_data.h @@ -1336,7 +1336,7 @@ FCT_sel (struct output_data *d) { assert (d->opoff1 % 8 == 0); assert (d->opoff1 / 8 == 5); - if (*d->param_start + 2 > d->end) + if (*d->param_start + 2 >= d->end) return -1; *d->param_start += 2; uint16_t absval = read_2ubyte_unaligned (&d->data[5]); diff --git a/libcpu/i386_disasm.c b/libcpu/i386_disasm.c index 8a206398..4422ffa2 100644 --- a/libcpu/i386_disasm.c +++ b/libcpu/i386_disasm.c @@ -610,7 +610,9 @@ i386_disasm (Ebl *ebl __attribute__((unused)), /* Account for displacement. */ if ((modrm & 0xc7) == 5 || (modrm & 0xc0) == 0x80 - || ((modrm & 0xc7) == 0x4 && (codep[0] & 0x7) == 0x5)) + || ((modrm & 0xc7) == 0x4 + && param_start < end + && (codep[0] & 0x7) == 0x5)) param_start += 4; else if ((modrm & 0xc0) == 0x40) param_start += 1; @@ -821,7 +823,8 @@ i386_disasm (Ebl *ebl __attribute__((unused)), } FALLTHROUGH; default: - assert (! "INVALID not handled"); + str = "INVALID not handled"; + break; } } else @@ -1124,8 +1127,9 @@ i386_disasm (Ebl *ebl __attribute__((unused)), /* Invalid (or at least unhandled) opcode. */ if (prefixes != 0) goto print_prefix; - assert (*startp == data); - ++data; + /* Make sure we get past the unrecognized opcode if we haven't yet. */ + if (*startp == data) + ++data; ADD_STRING ("(bad)"); addr += data - begin; -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.