On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 16:13 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > How about this, does it look reasonable? It doesn't handle SET6/SUB6 > yet, and eu-readelf -wframe doesn't agree with readelf -wf, so this > is only a RFC.
I don't really like adding not really existing types to the translation types ELF_T_... I rather see the add/sub part be done as extra argument to the reloc_simple_type callback. Maybe simply as an int addsub, which can be -1, 0, 1. It does mean more code needs to be adjusted, but this is an internal interface, so it can just be changed. Thanks, Mark
