On Thu, 2018-05-24 at 21:08 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Handle all new DW_RLE opcodes in .debug_rnglists in dwarf_ranges. Extract > code for reading .debug_addr indexes from dwarf_formaddr as __libdw_addrx > to reuse in __libdw_read_begin_end_pair_inc. And add new testcase.
Pushed this to master. But I first regenerated the new test files with a newer GCC that fixes the location expressions as promised for the just posted "libdw: Handle .debug_loclists in dwarf_getlocation" patch. It seemed better to only have one set in the tree. Both testfileranges5.debug and testfilesplitranges5.debug got regenerated (and the test results slightly adjusted) to show that the ranges are identical for both, even though they are using completely different DWARF encodings. Cheers, Mark
