I'll ping it next week and follow-up. Thanks! Regards, Gustavo
On 24-07-2017 17:47, Gustavo Romero wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On 24-07-2017 16:17, Mark Wielaard wrote: >>>> We normally keep elf.h in sync with glibc. >>>> Could you submit this elf.h change to libc-al...@sourceware.org? >>>> Then we resync elf.h from glibc to pull in the new constants. >>> >>> It looks like glibc community won't review / push that change as it is in >>> freeze for glibc 2.26 cut right now accordingly to [1]. >>> >>> If my understanding is correct, it's a blocker or my change can be pushed >>> to elfutils and once glibc is open again (in about a week) I can submit >>> this elf.h change to libc-al...@sourceware.org? >> >> Lets call it a soft-block :) It is just that I hate the files getting >> out of sync. We risk using slightly differently named constants. It >> looks like the 2.26 release will be next week, so hopefully the freeze >> will be over end of this week. >> >> Could you post the fix to libc-alpha already and then ping it next >> week once the tree open up again? Then I'll push your patch to >> elfutils. > > Posted: https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-07/msg00827.html > > Thank you and best regards, > Gustavo >