On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:51:14 -0400 Matthew Mondor <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:54:01 +0200 > Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <[email protected]> wrote: > > * I am not going to change ECL's license. LGPL3's restrictions on web > > applications seem stupid to me and, as experience has shown, making such a > > move will only make things worse. Already LGPL2 is a hindrance, but I can > > live with it. > > This is something I'd like to understand better: what restrictions does > LGPL3 add on network services? Does it have to do with the fact that > web applications disclose source, versus my example of using a web > server compiled using ECL? Oh I think that I now see that it could be possible to redistribute [L]GPLv3 licensed code under the AGPLv3, which then indeed adds more restrictions... -- Matt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
