On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Christoph Egger <[email protected]>wrote:
> It seems 11.1.1 lost the ability to build against the system
> provided libatomic-ops (10.3.1 did build against it just fine). Is there
> a reason for this regression? or a fix?
>
When making such a statement, some further information is always desirable.
You seem to be assuming that we even knew that was happening before :-)
Juanjo
--
Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
_______________________________________________
Ecls-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
