On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Jeff Hollingsworth <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree this makes sense to have as one repo. The exact why it was split is > long ago lost to me. > > I don't think the source tar ball size is an issue. I also think merging > the cmake is a good longer term goal. > > The only thing that makes sense is to keep the RPMs separate since there > could be situations where production machines need dyninst, but would not > want the test cases. > > Jeff
Assuming we want to move forward on this, it should be fairly simple to just use git-subtree (https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/contrib/subtree/git-subtree.txt) to merge the testsuite repo with full history and add an add_subdirectory(testsuite) cmake call to build the testsuite. Thanks, Peter _______________________________________________ Dyninst-api mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/dyninst-api
