On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:03:47PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote: > On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:00:07 +0200 > Preben Randhol <[email protected]> wrote: > > > That said, in most cases there is now no reason no to choose Matlab > > over Octave. > > > <EDIT> > That said, in most cases there is now no reason to choose Matlab > over Octave. > </EDIT> > Are there any BSD-style licensed equivalents?
- Re: [dwm] dwm's future Antoni Grzymala
- Re: [dwm] dwm's future Matthias-Christian Ott
- Re: [dwm] dwm's future Amit Uttamchandani
- Re: [dwm] dwm's future Matthias-Christian Ott
- Re: [dwm] dwm's future Jeremy Jay
- Re: [dwm] dwm's future Matthias-Christian Ott
- Re: [dwm] dwm's future Thomas Lavergne
- Re: [dwm] dwm's future Ross Mohn
- Re: [dwm] dwm's future Preben Randhol
- Re: [dwm] dwm's future Preben Randhol
- Re: [dwm] dwm's future Martin Oppegaard
- Re: [dwm] dwm's future Szabolcs Nagy
- Re: [dwm] dwm's future Martin Oppegaard
- Re: [dwm] dwm's future Preben Randhol
- Re: [dwm] dwm's future Martin Oppegaard
- Re: [dwm] dwm's future Preben Randhol
- Re: [dwm] dwm's future Martin Oppegaard
- Re: [dwm] dwm's future Preben Randhol
- Re: [dwm] dwm's future Martin Oppegaard
- Re: [dwm] dwm's future Szabolcs Nagy
- Re: [dwm] dwm's future Matthias-Christian Ott
