On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:51:24 +0200 Martin Oppegaard <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:47:19AM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote: > > Personally I would like to have one dwm as is, and one gdwm (or some > > better name) with more bells and whistles and dependencies. > > http://wmii.suckless.org/ > > Or is Wmii dead in the water? > Well actually I wan't thinking of wmii as it behaves differently from dwm.
